Explain this statement and conclude your discussion by saying whether Essay

Explain this statement and conclude your discussion by saying whether or not you stand for with the law commissions current proposa - Essay ExampleLaws regarding the rights of consumers across the UK were not cherishive enough to sufficiently safe-conduct the interest of consumers. The new laws were, therefore, put forward to enhance sanity in sales of products and consumption of faulty products. In order to show that the grievances presented by the European management were heard, the Law Commission published laws that would hold dear the consumers against consumption of faulty goods. Law Commission made an indirect response to the European Commissions paper with pretence that it was responding to the 2002 Consumer Sales Directive. Whether or not the publication of the Law Commission was ignited by the October release of the European Commission, these laws argon a sure relief to the UK consumers. The laws protect the rights of consumers in a counsel that had not been possible i n the past. A critical analysis of the Law Commission Proposals and Remedies for Faulty goods to Consumers relays a lot to be desired about the laws. The need for harmonization of European consumer rights and related remedies was the primary physical object of both publications. Whereas the consultative paper was not designed to directly respond to the The European Law Commission Proposals, it indirectly touched the core values of that proposal as an attempt to harmonize solely united Kingdom Laws relating to consumer rights and remedies with those of the Commission proposals. This Consultative paper further earmarked an indirect advice to the commission regarding short term remedies to be harmonized across substance members without necessarily deviating from the traditional Contract Law remedies like rejection, repair and replacement or rescission (The Joint Consultative Paper, 2009, P.63). European Commission Proposals are another area of the laws that march great deal of fa scinating and likeable issues. The Law Commission Proposals were aimed at achieving the consumer acquis across the European Union relating to goods consumed and trading rights (The European Law Commission,2008). These rights include the right of withdrawal by the consumer from an ambigueous contract and is associated with the cooling complete period, the need to protect consumers from aggressive commercial practices, removal of all trade barriers across all member states boarders, promotion of online contractual arrangements or trading among other things. The right of withdrawal is concerned with doorway to door and distance trading activities including both goods and services rendered to the consumer (Schultze, 2009, P.179). By all means, such steps to protect the rights of citizens of the wider European Union are a reason to smile about. The commission proposals are most belike going to enhance economic productivity of the region with increased trade and commerce. These Europea n Commission proposals are majorly intended to harmonize trading activities among European states and once the Union has achieved this, it will have a break-dance competitive advantage over other regions in trade and industry. The major bottleneck is understanding the little and macro economic factors that drives businesses. More in particular is an understanding of the